< 

Transvoyeur Programme 2007 - 2008

Transvoyeur International DV 2007 (Digital Video Platform) 'Laissez-Faire, Creative Destruction, Disruptive Technology'.
August - December 2007

Call for Digital Video Submissions.
'Laissez-Faire, Creative Destruction, Disruptive Technology'.
Transvoyeur International DV Platform 2007.

12 June 2007.
y'. Co-curated by Chris Boyd and Gaynor Evelyn Sweeney with associate technical support by Tony Knox.

A digital video screening is being prepared to run from Autumn this year in:

Liverpool (UK).
London (UK).
New York (US).
Cologne (Germany).
BBC Big Screen (Liverpool, UK).

Venues to be confirmed and announced with to further to be added.

If you wish to submit to this programme please email the following information to Gaynor Evelyn Sweeney (UK Projects Co-ordinator) at transvoyeuruk@hotmail.co.uk.

- Name.
- Email.
- Website.
- Professional Statement (no more than 250 words).
- Title and summary description of film concept (no more than 150 words).
- Photographic still of digital video short (72 dpi jpeg).

From this preliminary submission you will receive the postal address to send your work.

The digital video format for submission:

- 2 @ DVD (PAL or NTSC, as work willl transfered to compilation of both formats).
- Running time maximum five minutes.
- Theme and title: 'Laissez-Faire, Creative Destruction, Disruptive Technology'.

Cut off Date: 21 June 2007.

Transvoyeur Artits - Call for Digital Video Submissions.
'Laissez-Faire, Creative Destruction, Disruptive Technology'.
Transvoyeur International DV Platform 2007.

Part of the Transvoyeur Programme 2007.

Co-Curators

Chris Boyd
E-mail: boydism@hotmail.com
Website: www.myspace.com/boydism
Mobile: +44(0)7866963061

Gaynor Evelyn Sweeney
E-mail: ges1967@hotmail.com
Website: www.gaynorevelynsweeney.co.uk
Mobile: +44(0)7944141519

Transvoyeur
E-mail: transvoyeuruk@hotmail.co.uk
Website: www.transvoyeur.com
Tel. No.: +44(0)151 726 0247
Mobile: +44(0)7944141519

Press and Media

Press Release

Transvoyeur International DV Platform 2007
'Laissez-Faire, Creative Destruction, Disruptive Technology'.


Programme
August - December 2007.
The Transvoyeur International DV 2007 is an international digital video platform and will screen new media in Liverpool (UK), London (UK), New York (US), Cologne (Germany) and BBC Big Screen (UK). The title and theme is 'Laissez-Faire, Creative Destruction, Disruptive Technology'. Co-curated by Chris Boyd and Gaynor Evelyn Sweeney with associate technical support by Tony Knox.
A digital video screening in a range of venues and spaces in Liverpool (UK), London (UK), New York (US), Cologne (Germany) and BBC Big Screen (UK).
Screening dates and venues to be announced.

Concept
The concept to the digital video programme is to provide a platform to contemporary art practitioners to reflect and produce visual representation of the economic phases laissez-faire, creative destruction and disruptive technology. To apply those medias of digital, cyber and more that permeate much of our lives by innovation, mass production, consumerism and commodification that change the socio-economic and cultural structures of post modern society. How the artist interprets the fundamentals of these terminologies is open to how their creative insight, knowledge and understanding conceptualise them as a collective set theme for consideration. All very much factors that have impacted on everyone’s lives in the 21st century from work, leisure, local, national and global communications, culture and commerce.

Contacts List for Transvoyeur DV 2007 Programme

Co-Curators

Chris Boyd
E-mail: boydism@hotmail.com
Website: www.myspace.com/boydism
Mobile: +44(0)7866963061

Gaynor Evelyn Sweeney
E-mail: ges1967@hotmail.com
Website: www.gaynorevelynsweeney.co.uk
Mobile: +44(0)7944141519

Transvoyeur
E-mail: transvoyeuruk@hotmail.co.uk
Website: www.transvoyeur.com
Tel. No.: +44(0)151 726 0247
Mobile: +44(0)7944141519

Additional Information

Research Terminologies

Laissez-faire

Laissez-faire is a French phrase meaning "let do". From the French diction first used by the 18th century physiocrats as an injunction against government interference with trade, it became used as a synonym for strict free market economics during the early and mid-19th century. It is generally understood to be a doctrine that maintains that private initiative and production are best allowed to roam free, opposing economic interventionism and taxation by the state beyond that which is perceived to be necessary to maintain individual liberty, peace, security, and property rights.

In the laissez-faire view, the state has no responsibility to engage in intervention to maintain a desired wealth distribution or to create a welfare state to protect people from poverty, instead relying on charity and the market system. Laissez-faire also embodies the notion that a government should not be in the business of granting privileges. As such, advocates of laissez-faire support the idea that the government should not create legal monopolies or use force to damage de facto monopolies. Supporters of laissez-faire also support the notion of free trade on the grounds that the state should not use protectionist measures, such as tariffs and subsidies, in order to curtail trade through national frontiers.

In the early stages of European and American economic theory, laissez-faire economic policy was in conflict with mercantilism, which had been the dominant system of the United Kingdom, Spain, France and other European countries, during their rise to power.

The term laissez-faire is often used interchangeably with the term "free market". Some use the term laissez-faire to refer to "let do, let pass" attitude for matters outside of economics.

Laissez-faire is associated with classical liberalism, libertarianism, and Objectivism. It was originally introduced in the English-language world in 1774, by George Whatley, in the book Principles of Trade, which was co-authored with Benjamin Franklin. Classical economists, such as Thomas Malthus, Adam Smith and David Ricardo did not use the term. Bentham employed it, but only with the advent of the Anti-Corn Law League did the term receive much of its (English) meaning. Free-market anarchists take the idea of laissez-faire to its full length by opposing all taxation, preferring law and order to be privately funded.

Creative Destruction

Creative destruction is the dynamic process inherent in a free market economy (or one that is largely so) of existing products (i.e., goods and services), production techniques, professions, companies and even entire industries becoming obsolete and dying out as a result of technological advances (including the development of new or improved products, more efficient production techniques and better distribution methods).

A term coined by Joseph Schumpeter in his work entitled "Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy" (1942) to denote a "process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one."

Creative destruction occurs when something new kills something older. A great example of this is personal computers. The industry, led by Microsoft and Intel, destroyed many mainframe computer companies, but in doing so, entrepreneurs created one of the most important inventions of this century.

Schumpeter goes so far as to say that the "process of creative destruction is the essential fact about capitalism." Unfortunately, while a great concept, this became one of the most overused buzzwords of the dotcom boom (and bust), with nearly every technology CEO talking about how creative destruction would replace the old economy with the new.

Disruptive Technology

Disruptive technology is a term coined by Harvard Business School professor Clayton M. Christensen to describe a new technology that unexpectedly displaces an established technology. In his 1997 best-selling book, "The Innovator's Dilemma," Christensen separates new technology into two categories: sustaining and disruptive. Sustaining technology relies on incremental improvements to an already established technology.

Disruptive technology lacks refinement, often has performance problems because it is new, appeals to a limited audience, and may not yet have a proven practical application. (Such was the case with Alexander Graham Bell's "electrical speech machine," which we now call the telephone.) In his book, Christensen points out that large corporations are designed to work with sustaining technologies. They excel at knowing their market, staying close to their customers, and having a mechanism in place to develop existing technology.

Conversely, they have trouble capitalizing on the potential efficiencies, cost-savings, or new marketing opportunities created by low-margin disruptive technologies. Using real-world examples to illustrate his point, Christensen demonstrates how it is not unusual for a big corporation to dismiss the value of a disruptive technology because it does not reinforce current company goals, only to be blindsided as the technology matures, gains a larger audience and marketshare, and threatens the status quo.

Professional Information

Chris Boyd (b. 1983, Warrington, England).


Chris Boyd.

Curatorial Statement

Chris Boyd is an Artist, Video Director and Curator.

As a Curator, he has explored the concept of ‘Chaosmos’ with an exhibition of work by recent graduates spanning sculpture, new media, photography and installation.

‘Chaosmos’, a term used by James Joyce to describe a "cosmos at the verge of chaos, one that is surging toward the exciting possibility of going out of existence, struggling onward at the edge of the existential abyss".

Boyd has collaborated with Noisefestival.com co-curating an exhibition including work selected by Stella Vine, during the Independents Biennial 2006 at the View Two Gallery (Liverpool, England).

His creative eye in contemporary arts and culture is one founded on philosophical discourse, the cannons and the innovation of new media and technology. His professional interest in the broader implications of Fine Art to the Contemporary establishes him with an innate vision in the constructs of temporal and spatial relationships from the alternative gallery practice to the dimensions of cyberspace and digital media.

Art and Philosophy

Chris Boyd is a draughtsman who creates videos that are painterly outpourings that integrate traditional techniques with modern computer animation. Boyd works in narrative that draws upon autobiography, psychology and mythology that mixes memory, metaphor, fact and fiction. The majority of these are based on creation and transformative processes that reference and / or attempt to address subjects like transhumanism and accelerating change.

Calling (Digital Video Still, Research), 2007.

Biography

Chris Boyd was born in 1983 in Warrington (Cheshire, England). He is a graduate Interactive Arts student at Manchester Metropolitan from 2003-2006. In 2004, Boyd received a Microwave award from FACT, the UK's leading organization for the development and exhibition of film, video and new media.

He won the Big Art Challenge, where he was labelled a genius by art critic Brian Sewell, the 6 part series on channel 5 was aiming to seek out the next Damien Hirst or JMW Turner with a prize of £10,000. In 2005 Chris received a Priestley prize and provided a video in 40 artists 40 Days, a special Tate Britain project supporting London's Olympic bid that brought the Games to Britain in 2012.

He curated the Chaosmos exhibition for the Liverpool Biennial 2006. He is currently working on array of commissions from London (UK) to LA (US) and researching new approaches in his creative practice of Ferrofluids, Psychology, mythology, and VJaying, as well as co-curating Transvoyeur DV 2007.

Gaynor Evelyn Sweeney (b. 1967, Liverpool, England).

Gaynor Evelyn Sweeney.

Curatorial Statement

Gaynor Evelyn Sweeney is an Artist, Curator and Founder of Transvoyeur has a history of a range of exhibitions and project in the UK, Europe and the US. She is currently completing her Doctorate at Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, England.

As Curator, she is an activist in initiating diverse projects from live art platforms, exhibitions, research and development and much more in contemporary arts and culture. From independent to collaborative programmes these have encompassed a range of curatorial constructs in spatiality from the conventions of the gallery context to the more innovative and technological explorations how art is experience and distributed, such web based, digital media and more to more alternative modes of expression in curatorial practice.

Her approach in curatorialship is extended from her creative philosophies in the hybridisation of concept, media and contextualisation. To initiate events that provide insight to current issues in society and culture, as well experimental and diversification in emergence of new theories and practices with collaboration of artists, curators, scientists, historians and more.

Art and Philosophy

She describes her mind and thoughts an anthology of memories, images and residues of sensations. Visualisation relative to others and not exclusive to her own existence. She states she is not insular, neither her genome, which is a recipe of hybridized evolutionary ingredients. Her temporal and spatial existence she asserts is more that her being. It extends to her lineage, not merely of those she is conscious or familiar; mother, father, grandmother, grandfathers, great and greater, as it dissolves back, but to one of the singular organism, where all life evolved.

The chance, the accident, the mistake of this greater-than-great relative of all ascended into cellular complexities of sentience, no more and no less than the amoeba. She welcomes you to our relative, the cell, the nuclei, the DNA, the RNA, etc.. Somewhere in her body, her pet dog is kindred. The canvas of creation, the biological edifice on which she inscribes, at the moment of mark-making on this, she is inscribing on not herself, but her pet dog, her parents and predecessors, her lovers and familiars, acquaintances and you.

A performance artist who places temporal concepts within the context of a live performance in the public arena, the conventional and institutional readdressed, including the various technological applications, such as multi media processes, holographic, optical engineering and digitalisation.

The Temple Series, Live performance as part of the Transvoyeur Exhibition 2004, Liverpool Biennial 2004.

Biography

Gaynor Evelyn Sweeney is a performance artist and graduate of Liverpool John Moores University, England, in 2002. She is currently on her doctorate and researching the body within contemporary arts, science an culture. Her art explores the temporality and spatiality of body politics within the post modern environment and institutional structures.

She has performed and exhibited in an array of international events, such as the Liverpool Biennial, Venice Biennial, Performance Art Festival (US), Hong Kong Biennial and Berlin Kunst Salon. Her art is strongly founded on the canon and philosophy within the context of live performance interventions, as well as considering new and innovative modes of expression modified through digital technology and optical engineering. Other projects and commissions have been in London, New York, Paris, Copenhagen and many other places.

Although she pursues her independent practice in performance art, she is a strong advocate of contemporary art practice, creating projects for exchange and dialogue in the concepts and philosophies of post modern art and society. To collaborate and share to realise new and diverse modes of thinking and creative expression in the international arts market.

She is also founder and Projects Co-ordinator of Gesquoi and TransVoyeur UK, both research and management programmes in arts and culture within the international market. She was also one of the original founders of the Whores of Babylon Arts Collective (UK).

Review of .....